Best Known (209−119, 209, s)-Nets in Base 3
(209−119, 209, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 209, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 209, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(209−119, 209, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (90, 209, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 209, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(209−119, 209, 492)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 209, 493)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 208, 493)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1801 446308 372272 102831 947703 624084 437157 656906 618649 586707 950621 594167 116342 360868 327507 990478 476331 > 3208 [i]