Best Known (210−119, 210, s)-Nets in Base 3
(210−119, 210, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 210, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 210, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(210−119, 210, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (91, 210, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 210, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(210−119, 210, 502)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 210, 503)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 209, 503)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 5248 378831 103000 880070 761771 681990 406340 185410 320679 336871 701697 841630 697966 663046 376501 726651 806443 > 3209 [i]