Best Known (112−12, 112, s)-Nets in Base 3
(112−12, 112, 797161)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 112, 797161)-net over F3, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(3112, 797161, F3, 12, 12) (dual of [(797161, 12), 9565820, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OA 6-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(3112, 4782966, F3, 12) (dual of [4782966, 4782854, 13]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3112, 4782969, F3, 12) (dual of [4782969, 4782857, 13]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3113, 4782970, F3, 13) (dual of [4782970, 4782857, 14]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782970 | 328−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1 = 14 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3113, 4782970, F3, 13) (dual of [4782970, 4782857, 14]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3112, 4782969, F3, 12) (dual of [4782969, 4782857, 13]-code), using
- OA 6-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(3112, 4782966, F3, 12) (dual of [4782966, 4782854, 13]-code), using
(112−12, 112, 1594323)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (100, 112, 1594323)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(3112, 1594323, F3, 3, 12) (dual of [(1594323, 3), 4782857, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(3112, 4782969, F3, 12) (dual of [4782969, 4782857, 13]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3113, 4782970, F3, 13) (dual of [4782970, 4782857, 14]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782970 | 328−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1 = 14 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3113, 4782970, F3, 13) (dual of [4782970, 4782857, 14]-code), using
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(3112, 4782969, F3, 12) (dual of [4782969, 4782857, 13]-code), using
(112−12, 112, large)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 112, large)-net in base 3, because
- 10 times m-reduction [i] would yield (100, 102, large)-net in base 3, but