Best Known (176−120, 176, s)-Nets in Base 3
(176−120, 176, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 176, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 176, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(176−120, 176, 64)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (56, 176, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 176, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(176−120, 176, 177)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (56, 176, 178)-net over F3, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (56, 173, 178)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3173, 178, F3, 117) (dual of [178, 5, 118]-code), but
(176−120, 176, 236)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 176, 237)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 146773 386787 576596 013449 024562 514362 613839 767828 617633 362793 923641 212003 822993 868977 > 3176 [i]