MinT - Best Known (63, 63+120, s)-Nets in Base 3

Best Known (63, 63+120, s)-Nets in Base 3

(63, 63+120, 48)-Net over F₃ — Constructive and digital

Digital (63, 183, 48)-net over F₃, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 183, 48)-net over F₃, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F₃, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
    - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(63, 63+120, 64)-Net over F₃ — Digital

Digital (63, 183, 64)-net over F₃, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 183, 64)-net over F₃, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F₃, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(63, 63+120, 213)-Net over F₃ — Upper bound on s (digital)

There is no digital (63, 183, 214)-net over F₃, because

extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3¹⁸³, 214, F₃, 120) (dual of [214, 31, 121]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(3⁶³, 93, S₃, 40), but
  - the linear programming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 3 468104 662873 063250 302984 700066 235894 540957 / 2 937118 328933 > 3⁶³ [i]

(63, 63+120, 275)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s

There is no (63, 183, 276)-net in base 3, because

the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3^mÂ â‰¥ 2322 501360 441590 432093 319207 641933 553936 423135 826337 727208 396299 527077 682927 094568 947969 > 3¹⁸³ [i]