Best Known (239−121, 239, s)-Nets in Base 3
(239−121, 239, 75)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (118, 239, 75)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (118, 74)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (22, 74)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- s-reduction based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (22, 74)-sequence over F9, using
(239−121, 239, 120)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (118, 239, 120)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (113, 239, 120)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (113, 119)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 113 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (113, 119)-sequence over F3, using
(239−121, 239, 847)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (118, 239, 848)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (118, 238, 848)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 369182 973914 889754 134318 157659 452327 816887 681878 380729 238730 328170 563542 567302 760512 564958 568215 305741 628156 091777 > 3238 [i]