Best Known (226−125, 226, s)-Nets in Base 3
(226−125, 226, 68)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (101, 226, 68)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (101, 67)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 67)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 67)-sequence over F9, using
(226−125, 226, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (101, 226, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 226, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(226−125, 226, 585)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (101, 226, 586)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (101, 225, 586)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 232329 052998 389720 609442 788863 844634 673015 454921 499818 201728 270411 292740 663943 749816 707631 073561 201485 939101 > 3225 [i]