Best Known (226−126, 226, s)-Nets in Base 3
(226−126, 226, 67)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 226, 67)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 66)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 66)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 66)-sequence over F9, using
(226−126, 226, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (100, 226, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 226, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(226−126, 226, 565)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 226, 566)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 713423 515050 077938 709840 866297 233135 212174 972931 054284 823012 978295 145731 919749 570902 737187 498973 752742 837033 > 3226 [i]