Best Known (249−127, 249, s)-Nets in Base 3
(249−127, 249, 78)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (122, 249, 78)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (121, 249, 78)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (121, 77)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (121, 77)-sequence over F3, using
(249−127, 249, 120)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (122, 249, 120)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (113, 249, 120)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (113, 119)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 113 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (113, 119)-sequence over F3, using
(249−127, 249, 857)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (122, 249, 858)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (122, 248, 858)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 22404 506162 039152 864391 112275 017535 948858 882233 451954 274433 218364 032074 723876 969307 792791 926475 093706 032884 282817 107161 > 3248 [i]