Best Known (224−129, 224, s)-Nets in Base 3
(224−129, 224, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 224, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 224, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(224−129, 224, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (95, 224, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 224, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(224−129, 224, 506)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 224, 507)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 223, 507)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 26708 159994 136254 327106 113912 865323 469489 888633 303091 897398 013765 718606 629479 804051 729193 389654 152603 504513 > 3223 [i]