Best Known (228−129, 228, s)-Nets in Base 3
(228−129, 228, 66)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 228, 66)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (99, 65)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 65)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 65)-sequence over F9, using
(228−129, 228, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (99, 228, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 228, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(228−129, 228, 546)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 228, 547)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 227, 547)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 123694 657753 500491 419125 094591 691860 897563 642198 313304 793655 070198 400332 086090 350185 885086 933283 702011 771777 > 3227 [i]