Best Known (36, 36+13, s)-Nets in Base 3
(36, 36+13, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 49, 156)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (35, 48, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 16, 52)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F27, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 16, 52)-net over F27, using
(36, 36+13, 365)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (36, 49, 365)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(349, 365, F3, 2, 13) (dual of [(365, 2), 681, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(349, 730, F3, 13) (dual of [730, 681, 14]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 730 | 312−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1 = 14 (BCH-bound) [i]
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(349, 730, F3, 13) (dual of [730, 681, 14]-code), using
(36, 36+13, 9815)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 49, 9816)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 48, 9816)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 79783 679280 370230 338577 > 348 [i]