Best Known (228−131, 228, s)-Nets in Base 3
(228−131, 228, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (97, 228, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 228, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(228−131, 228, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (97, 228, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 228, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(228−131, 228, 518)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (97, 228, 519)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (97, 227, 519)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 026703 322731 802303 356163 307346 562131 661483 410561 961810 729372 793343 110042 546534 533089 095497 988101 345269 255055 > 3227 [i]