Best Known (92, 92+133, s)-Nets in Base 3
(92, 92+133, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 225, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 225, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(92, 92+133, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (92, 225, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 225, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(92, 92+133, 466)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 225, 467)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (92, 224, 467)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 79142 091809 506681 504458 928568 102621 670811 133080 810161 896575 522547 387491 374282 122008 579864 135072 720712 042565 > 3224 [i]