Best Known (93, 93+135, s)-Nets in Base 3
(93, 93+135, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 228, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 228, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(93, 93+135, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (93, 228, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 228, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(93, 93+135, 469)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 228, 470)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 227, 470)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 052302 680415 783110 477052 632518 304346 387113 299586 679317 632310 744155 270405 084539 376504 280543 349233 541559 670305 > 3227 [i]