Best Known (95, 95+135, s)-Nets in Base 3
(95, 95+135, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 230, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 230, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(95, 95+135, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (95, 230, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 230, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(95, 95+135, 487)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 230, 488)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 229, 488)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 19 207464 589348 604238 032940 921201 327412 682131 643276 956342 567685 094901 112430 164127 960251 595159 093719 325621 337377 > 3229 [i]