Best Known (235−136, 235, s)-Nets in Base 3
(235−136, 235, 66)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 235, 66)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (99, 65)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 65)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 65)-sequence over F9, using
(235−136, 235, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (99, 235, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 235, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(235−136, 235, 518)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 235, 519)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 14565 165416 459368 820114 986789 827292 824598 780001 266305 965423 546302 636696 433141 407158 384759 374941 038230 449692 800505 > 3235 [i]