Best Known (96, 96+137, s)-Nets in Base 3
(96, 96+137, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 233, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 233, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(96, 96+137, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (96, 233, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 233, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(96, 96+137, 490)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 233, 491)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 232, 491)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 504 841358 507882 304929 298275 193140 874582 177539 209202 796180 912212 737773 611344 448100 699349 066291 820270 367739 557465 > 3232 [i]