Best Known (172−138, 172, s)-Nets in Base 3
(172−138, 172, 38)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 172, 38)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 172, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
(172−138, 172, 46)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (34, 172, 46)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 172, 46)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 45)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 46, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 45)-sequence over F3, using
(172−138, 172, 86)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 172, 87)-net in base 3, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 169, 87)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3169, 87, S3, 2, 135), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 34831 892110 592771 988701 292967 816900 663202 927024 414813 316873 143916 304132 301341 123923 / 68 > 3169 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3169, 87, S3, 2, 135), but