Best Known (106, 106+139, s)-Nets in Base 3
(106, 106+139, 73)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 245, 73)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (106, 72)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 72)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 72)-sequence over F9, using
(106, 106+139, 104)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (106, 245, 104)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (102, 245, 104)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 102 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
(106, 106+139, 579)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 245, 580)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (106, 244, 580)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 267 315562 271447 977774 320967 167761 795407 820733 672424 753956 271829 201769 656954 525317 358120 639522 880619 742469 740239 716969 > 3244 [i]