Best Known (249−169, 249, s)-Nets in Base 3
(249−169, 249, 55)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (80, 249, 55)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (80, 54)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 54)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- s-reduction based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 54)-sequence over F9, using
(249−169, 249, 84)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (80, 249, 84)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 249, 84)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F3, using
(249−169, 249, 248)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (80, 249, 249)-net over F3, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (80, 242, 249)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3242, 249, F3, 162) (dual of [249, 7, 163]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(380, 86, F3, 54) (dual of [86, 6, 55]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(326, 31, F3, 18) (dual of [31, 5, 19]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(38, 12, F3, 6) (dual of [12, 4, 7]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(326, 31, F3, 18) (dual of [31, 5, 19]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(380, 86, F3, 54) (dual of [86, 6, 55]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3242, 249, F3, 162) (dual of [249, 7, 163]-code), but
(249−169, 249, 333)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (80, 249, 334)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (80, 248, 334)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 21906 114077 483654 489731 902682 361368 109358 186406 770270 620296 090018 625864 080707 565554 203059 260927 710719 433818 366655 801385 > 3248 [i]