Best Known (236−188, 236, s)-Nets in Base 3
(236−188, 236, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 236, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 236, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(236−188, 236, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (48, 236, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 236, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(236−188, 236, 118)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 236, 119)-net in base 3, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 233, 119)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3233, 119, S3, 2, 185), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 53156 313053 474140 041402 877967 298138 513619 309498 388507 901554 774844 073139 517587 831088 843499 409743 443448 737116 430828 / 31 > 3233 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3233, 119, S3, 2, 185), but