Best Known (50, 50+196, s)-Nets in Base 3
(50, 50+196, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 246, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 246, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(50, 50+196, 64)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (50, 246, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 246, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(50, 50+196, 123)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 246, 124)-net in base 3, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 243, 124)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3243, 124, S3, 2, 193), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 11770 601735 604729 357392 994529 091204 179090 149774 638786 261545 904624 128780 557652 664392 369199 237422 277220 766792 455464 859645 / 97 > 3243 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3243, 124, S3, 2, 193), but