Best Known (228−197, 228, s)-Nets in Base 3
(228−197, 228, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 228, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 228, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(228−197, 228, 42)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (31, 228, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (29, 228, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(228−197, 228, 74)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 228, 75)-net in base 3, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 220, 75)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3220, 75, S3, 3, 189), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 25005 745253 694267 115918 266546 661877 100947 851924 479155 683111 942268 320067 287614 161820 805837 058931 962084 566827 / 19 > 3220 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3220, 75, S3, 3, 189), but