Best Known (245−198, 245, s)-Nets in Base 3
(245−198, 245, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 245, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 245, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(245−198, 245, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (47, 245, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 245, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(245−198, 245, 116)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 245, 117)-net in base 3, because
- 16 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 229, 117)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3229, 117, S3, 2, 182), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 1476 564251 485392 778927 857721 313837 180933 869708 288569 663932 077079 002031 653266 328641 356763 872492 873429 131586 567523 / 61 > 3229 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3229, 117, S3, 2, 182), but