Best Known (248−199, 248, s)-Nets in Base 3
(248−199, 248, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 248, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 248, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(248−199, 248, 64)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (49, 248, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
(248−199, 248, 121)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 248, 122)-net in base 3, because
- 9 times m-reduction [i] would yield (49, 239, 122)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3239, 122, S3, 2, 190), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 319 695355 781856 846744 007258 814822 829555 534932 150683 083646 925804 605966 879343 652613 126077 016325 049504 761567 202494 107299 / 191 > 3239 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3239, 122, S3, 2, 190), but