Best Known (88, 88+21, s)-Nets in Base 3
(88, 88+21, 640)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 109, 640)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (87, 108, 640)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (86, 108, 640)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 27, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 27, 160)-net over F81, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (86, 108, 640)-net over F3, using
(88, 88+21, 2025)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (88, 109, 2025)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3109, 2025, F3, 21) (dual of [2025, 1916, 22]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3109, 2199, F3, 21) (dual of [2199, 2090, 22]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,10]) ⊂ C([1,10]) [i] based on
- linear OA(399, 2188, F3, 21) (dual of [2188, 2089, 22]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2188 | 314−1, defining interval I = [0,10], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−10,−9,…,10}|+1 = 22 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(398, 2188, F3, 10) (dual of [2188, 2090, 11]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2188 | 314−1, defining interval I = [1,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- linear OA(310, 11, F3, 10) (dual of [11, 1, 11]-code or 11-arc in PG(9,3)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 11 [i]
- construction X applied to C([0,10]) ⊂ C([1,10]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3109, 2199, F3, 21) (dual of [2199, 2090, 22]-code), using
(88, 88+21, 321990)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 109, 321991)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (88, 108, 321991)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3381 445427 580502 398104 294038 891582 605827 856129 112317 > 3108 [i]