Best Known (244−210, 244, s)-Nets in Base 3
(244−210, 244, 38)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 244, 38)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 244, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
(244−210, 244, 46)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (34, 244, 46)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 244, 46)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 45)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 46, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 45)-sequence over F3, using
(244−210, 244, 80)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 244, 81)-net in base 3, because
- 6 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 238, 81)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3238, 81, S3, 3, 204), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 87 189642 485960 958202 911070 585860 771696 964072 404731 750085 525219 437990 967093 723439 943475 549906 831683 116791 055225 665627 / 205 > 3238 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3238, 81, S3, 3, 204), but