Best Known (92−22, 92, s)-Nets in Base 3
(92−22, 92, 400)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (70, 92, 400)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 23, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
(92−22, 92, 598)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (70, 92, 598)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(392, 598, F3, 22) (dual of [598, 506, 23]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(392, 754, F3, 22) (dual of [754, 662, 23]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(21) ⊂ Ce(16) [i] based on
- linear OA(385, 729, F3, 22) (dual of [729, 644, 23]-code), using an extension Ce(21) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = [1,21], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- linear OA(367, 729, F3, 17) (dual of [729, 662, 18]-code), using an extension Ce(16) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- linear OA(37, 25, F3, 4) (dual of [25, 18, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(37, 26, F3, 4) (dual of [26, 19, 5]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 26 = 33−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(37, 26, F3, 4) (dual of [26, 19, 5]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(21) ⊂ Ce(16) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(392, 754, F3, 22) (dual of [754, 662, 23]-code), using
(92−22, 92, 24002)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (70, 92, 24003)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 78 556830 284290 226015 334978 703234 937098 145563 > 392 [i]