Best Known (126−28, 126, s)-Nets in Base 3
(126−28, 126, 464)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (98, 126, 464)-net over F3, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (98, 128, 464)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 32, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 32, 116)-net over F81, using
(126−28, 126, 1014)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (98, 126, 1014)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3126, 1014, F3, 28) (dual of [1014, 888, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3126, 1093, F3, 28) (dual of [1093, 967, 29]-code), using
(126−28, 126, 59486)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (98, 126, 59487)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 310086 796003 047797 637976 839604 974024 569683 078332 884370 900389 > 3126 [i]