Best Known (86, 86+29, s)-Nets in Base 3
(86, 86+29, 264)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 115, 264)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (85, 114, 264)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 38, 88)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 38, 88)-net over F27, using
(86, 86+29, 542)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (86, 115, 542)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3115, 542, F3, 29) (dual of [542, 427, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3115, 728, F3, 29) (dual of [728, 613, 30]-code), using
(86, 86+29, 23190)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 115, 23191)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 114, 23191)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 466162 747986 650157 632200 322376 506503 191825 716363 953237 > 3114 [i]