Best Known (137−32, 137, s)-Nets in Base 3
(137−32, 137, 464)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 137, 464)-net over F3, using
- 31 times duplication [i] based on digital (104, 136, 464)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 34, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 34, 116)-net over F81, using
(137−32, 137, 824)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (105, 137, 824)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3137, 824, F3, 32) (dual of [824, 687, 33]-code), using
- 71 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 18 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(3125, 741, F3, 32) (dual of [741, 616, 33]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([334,364]), C2 = C([336,365]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([336,364]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([334,365]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3118, 728, F3, 31) (dual of [728, 610, 32]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = {334,335,…,364}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 32 [i]
- linear OA(3118, 728, F3, 30) (dual of [728, 610, 31]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = {336,337,…,365}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- linear OA(3124, 728, F3, 32) (dual of [728, 604, 33]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = {334,335,…,365}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
- linear OA(3112, 728, F3, 29) (dual of [728, 616, 30]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = {336,337,…,364}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 30 [i]
- linear OA(31, 7, F3, 1) (dual of [7, 6, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(30, 6, F3, 0) (dual of [6, 6, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(30, s, F3, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([334,364]), C2 = C([336,365]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([336,364]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([334,365]) [i] based on
- 71 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 18 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(3125, 741, F3, 32) (dual of [741, 616, 33]-code), using
(137−32, 137, 41371)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 137, 41372)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 232149 113131 229057 014857 112250 414482 777710 868086 525318 654093 620865 > 3137 [i]