Best Known (98, 98+33, s)-Nets in Base 3
(98, 98+33, 282)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (98, 131, 282)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (98, 132, 282)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 44, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 44, 94)-net over F27, using
(98, 98+33, 595)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (98, 131, 595)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3131, 595, F3, 33) (dual of [595, 464, 34]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3131, 742, F3, 33) (dual of [742, 611, 34]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(33) ⊂ Ce(30) [i] based on
- linear OA(3130, 729, F3, 34) (dual of [729, 599, 35]-code), using an extension Ce(33) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = [1,33], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
- linear OA(3118, 729, F3, 31) (dual of [729, 611, 32]-code), using an extension Ce(30) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 36−1, defining interval I = [1,30], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- linear OA(31, 13, F3, 1) (dual of [13, 12, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(31, s, F3, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(33) ⊂ Ce(30) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3131, 742, F3, 33) (dual of [742, 611, 34]-code), using
(98, 98+33, 25577)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (98, 131, 25578)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (98, 130, 25578)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 106 153463 690902 333034 523315 778348 734556 234432 412167 532318 495649 > 3130 [i]