Best Known (75−37, 75, s)-Nets in Base 3
(75−37, 75, 41)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 75, 41)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 23, 13)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 12)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 4, N(F) = 12, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 12, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 12)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 52, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (5, 23, 13)-net over F3, using
(75−37, 75, 52)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (38, 75, 52)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 75, 52)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 51)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 51)-sequence over F3, using
(75−37, 75, 328)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 75, 329)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 74, 329)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 208313 218214 292708 742414 124307 854745 > 374 [i]