Best Known (19, 19+38, s)-Nets in Base 3
(19, 19+38, 28)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 57, 28)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (15, 57, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
(19, 19+38, 32)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (19, 57, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
(19, 19+38, 67)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (19, 57, 68)-net over F3, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(357, 68, F3, 38) (dual of [68, 11, 39]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
(19, 19+38, 69)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 57, 70)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (19, 56, 70)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(356, 70, S3, 37), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 185 546099 770621 322782 066734 120777 / 337535 > 356 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(356, 70, S3, 37), but