Best Known (21, 21+5, s)-Nets in Base 3
(21, 21+5, 6480)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 26, 6480)-net over F3, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(326, 6480, F3, 5, 5) (dual of [(6480, 5), 32374, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(326, 12961, F3, 5) (dual of [12961, 12935, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(326, 12962, F3, 5) (dual of [12962, 12936, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(913, 6481, F9, 5) (dual of [6481, 6468, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(326, 12962, F3, 5) (dual of [12962, 12936, 6]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(326, 12961, F3, 5) (dual of [12961, 12935, 6]-code), using
(21, 21+5, 8595)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (21, 26, 8595)-net over F3, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(326, 8595, F3, 5, 5) (dual of [(8595, 5), 42949, 6]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(326, 8595, F3, 4, 5) (dual of [(8595, 4), 34354, 6]-NRT-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(326, 8595, F3, 5) (dual of [8595, 8569, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(326, 12962, F3, 5) (dual of [12962, 12936, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(913, 6481, F9, 5) (dual of [6481, 6468, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(326, 12962, F3, 5) (dual of [12962, 12936, 6]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(326, 8595, F3, 5) (dual of [8595, 8569, 6]-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(326, 8595, F3, 4, 5) (dual of [(8595, 4), 34354, 6]-NRT-code), using
(21, 21+5, 650878)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 26, 650879)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (21, 25, 650879)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 847290 850557 > 325 [i]