Best Known (229−61, 229, s)-Nets in Base 3
(229−61, 229, 288)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (168, 229, 288)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (167, 229, 288)-net over F3, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (167, 234, 288)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 78, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 78, 96)-net over F27, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (167, 234, 288)-net over F3, using
(229−61, 229, 748)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (168, 229, 748)-net over F3, using
(229−61, 229, 25431)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (168, 229, 25432)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (168, 228, 25432)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6 077879 048789 639199 869690 845358 742413 793411 294956 259427 735063 815411 156052 338928 766454 982471 343068 095838 917265 > 3228 [i]