Best Known (92−61, 92, s)-Nets in Base 3
(92−61, 92, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 92, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 92, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(92−61, 92, 42)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (31, 92, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (29, 92, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(92−61, 92, 102)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 92, 103)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 91, 103)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(391, 103, S3, 60), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 4 638397 686588 101979 328150 167890 591454 318967 698009 / 161161 > 391 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(391, 103, S3, 60), but