Best Known (126, 126+61, s)-Nets in Base 3
(126, 126+61, 162)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 187, 162)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 188, 162)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 94, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 94, 81)-net over F9, using
(126, 126+61, 322)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (126, 187, 322)-net over F3, using
(126, 126+61, 5439)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 187, 5440)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 186, 5440)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 55655 830991 126133 025099 608901 927249 408399 539847 582414 616859 682052 596941 122324 325132 184449 > 3186 [i]