Best Known (202−64, 202, s)-Nets in Base 3
(202−64, 202, 164)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 202, 164)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (138, 203, 164)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 39, 16)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (99, 164, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 82, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 82, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (7, 39, 16)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(202−64, 202, 377)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (138, 202, 377)-net over F3, using
(202−64, 202, 6540)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 202, 6541)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 399021 366867 598142 601279 267280 669534 714236 916208 682503 541314 125498 116567 177232 047940 183797 435265 > 3202 [i]