Best Known (205−65, 205, s)-Nets in Base 3
(205−65, 205, 167)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 205, 167)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 41, 19)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 18)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 19, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 18)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (99, 164, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 82, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 82, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (9, 41, 19)-net over F3, using
(205−65, 205, 381)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (140, 205, 381)-net over F3, using
(205−65, 205, 7007)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 205, 7008)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (140, 204, 7008)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 21 577948 494099 555626 698680 202373 672505 218009 976601 527832 492376 603459 298896 756683 818001 534823 952385 > 3204 [i]