Best Known (32, 32+65, s)-Nets in Base 3
(32, 32+65, 38)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 97, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
(32, 32+65, 42)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (32, 97, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (29, 97, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(32, 32+65, 105)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 97, 106)-net in base 3, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 94, 106)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(394, 106, S3, 62), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 36 248218 958151 463616 231099 460182 029513 381562 380737 / 44872 > 394 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(394, 106, S3, 62), but