Best Known (129, 129+67, s)-Nets in Base 3
(129, 129+67, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (129, 196, 156)-net over F3, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 214, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 107, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 107, 78)-net over F9, using
(129, 129+67, 290)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (129, 196, 290)-net over F3, using
(129, 129+67, 4309)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (129, 196, 4310)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (129, 195, 4310)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1097 449280 228088 010299 708915 755100 176020 106462 760694 744143 993717 552281 921443 854056 299779 942765 > 3195 [i]