Best Known (195−69, 195, s)-Nets in Base 3
(195−69, 195, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 195, 156)-net over F3, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 208, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 104, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 104, 78)-net over F9, using
(195−69, 195, 260)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (126, 195, 260)-net over F3, using
(195−69, 195, 3538)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 195, 3539)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 194, 3539)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 367 596784 021110 887799 884036 055534 724464 034249 284416 475037 179352 039909 477259 787935 862790 245765 > 3194 [i]