Best Known (140, 140+69, s)-Nets in Base 3
(140, 140+69, 162)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 209, 162)-net over F3, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (140, 216, 162)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 108, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (32, 108, 81)-net over F9, using
(140, 140+69, 341)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (140, 209, 341)-net over F3, using
(140, 140+69, 5581)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 209, 5582)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (140, 208, 5582)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1753 247008 575597 105626 186590 611143 729520 017121 115918 310503 954858 193770 651015 838547 619667 155544 657565 > 3208 [i]