Best Known (144, 144+69, s)-Nets in Base 3
(144, 144+69, 164)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 213, 164)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 41, 16)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 15)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (103, 172, 148)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 86, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 86, 74)-net over F9, using
- digital (7, 41, 16)-net over F3, using
(144, 144+69, 368)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (144, 213, 368)-net over F3, using
(144, 144+69, 6355)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 213, 6356)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (144, 212, 6356)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 141435 978266 265531 757626 378668 772691 977745 490916 393138 124781 954697 660847 367599 672547 737229 278690 949145 > 3212 [i]