Best Known (38, 38+69, s)-Nets in Base 3
(38, 38+69, 38)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 107, 38)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 107, 38)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 37)-sequence over F3, using
(38, 38+69, 52)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (38, 107, 52)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 107, 52)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 51)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 51)-sequence over F3, using
(38, 38+69, 125)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 107, 126)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 106, 126)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3106, 126, S3, 68), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 061877 790063 016487 101437 522958 614020 021078 388104 588955 021944 / 2475 548075 > 3106 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3106, 126, S3, 68), but