Best Known (39, 39+69, s)-Nets in Base 3
(39, 39+69, 42)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 108, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
(39, 39+69, 52)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (39, 108, 52)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 108, 52)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 51)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 51)-sequence over F3, using
(39, 39+69, 130)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 108, 131)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 107, 131)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3107, 131, S3, 68), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 10193 910511 382960 109087 704226 878170 396646 633604 029190 685770 555639 / 8 455854 494087 > 3107 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3107, 131, S3, 68), but