Best Known (202−73, 202, s)-Nets in Base 3
(202−73, 202, 156)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (129, 202, 156)-net over F3, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 214, 156)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 107, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 107, 78)-net over F9, using
(202−73, 202, 252)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (129, 202, 252)-net over F3, using
(202−73, 202, 3257)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (129, 202, 3258)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (129, 201, 3258)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 797015 017100 385331 989356 277994 237462 216756 831480 105856 145074 014176 016117 667756 895666 924210 984681 > 3201 [i]