MinT - Best Known (149−75, 149, s)-Nets in Base 3

Best Known (149−75, 149, s)-Nets in Base 3

(149−75, 149, 60)-Net over F₃ — Constructive and digital

Digital (74, 149, 60)-net over F₃, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (74, 150, 60)-net over F₃, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (15, 53, 28)-net over F₃, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F₃, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  2. digital (21, 97, 32)-net over F₃, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F₃, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(149−75, 149, 84)-Net over F₃ — Digital

Digital (74, 149, 84)-net over F₃, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (71, 149, 84)-net over F₃, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (71, 83)-sequence over F₃, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 71 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
    - algebraic function fields over â„¤₃ by Niederreiter/Xing [i]

(149−75, 149, 557)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s

There is no (74, 149, 558)-net in base 3, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (74, 148, 558)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3^mÂ â‰¥ 41540 965523 235303 895107 825404 692369 318239 279093 555193 908539 934924 199349 > 3¹⁴⁸ [i]